« Obama in Europe: Is honeymoon over? | On interrogation and torture »
Is the era of US dollar definitely over?
Questions:
1. What advantages and disadvantages would
the creating of the new, global currency have? Is the US opposing the
idea only because it would lose it's advantageous position in the
financial world or are Washington's counterarguments based not solely
on political grounds?
2. Could the creating of the global currency and replacing dollar
as standard reserve currency help to find the way out of the current
crisis? What would happen if for example China, Russia and the EU
decide to abandon dollar as the standard reserve currency and create
the new one without the US?
3. According to the Nobel prize laureate Joseph Stiglitz is the use
of USD as reserve currency unfair to developing countries . What
advantage does the US get with dollar as a standard reserve currency.
4.
Euro was quite succesfull attempt to create multinational currency.
What is the position of euro in current global monetary system. Can
euro have the ambition eventually to replace dollar as the standard
reserve currency?
Answers:
Menzie David Chinn, Associate Director at Department of Economics, University of
1,2. I think it is misleading to interpret
the call for using the SDR as a call for a new currency. The SDR is an
accounting device. A true currency would be backed up by a central bank, and
the IMF is not a central bank. This does not mean that using a different unit
of account wouldn't have a big impact. This would essentially reduce to many
countries pegging to baskets of currencies rather to a given one (either US
dollar, or the euro).
3. The role of the US dollar as the key
reserve asset means that it is easier for the
4. It is possible for the euro to overtake
the dollar as the world's reserve currency. But we would need to see a drastic
shock to the
Christian Kellermann, International Policy Analysis Unit, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
1. Creating a global currency is the optimal
solution to avoid the so-called seignorage dilemma, which states that a country
issuing the world's currency for reserves (and trade) is utterly creating a situation
of global imbalances meaning that other countries, doing trade with the
currency issuer, need to finance the issuer's external deficits. A genuine
global currency issued and managed by an international body could avoid this
dilemma by macroprudential adapations. The
2. No. Creating a supranational currency unit requires a couple of
institutional changes, which take time and are a regulatory idea for the long
run. The IMF or any other issuer of the world currency would have to take up
tasks of a global central bank, which requires an enormous political will to cooperate and give up national sovereignty not at sight at
the moment. To the second part of your question: this is already the case to
some degree. Especially in the EU, the Euro serves as an alternative to the Dollar
and this is more and more the case in other countries, which shift their
reserves gradually into Euros. Furthermore, particularly in
3. The Dollar allows the
4. The European capital market has the
depth and size to take up the role of a global currency for trade and reserves,
but this would not solve the seignorage dilemma mentioned above. Our current
scenario is that Euro and Dollar will in future further compete for that role
and reduce some of the negative effects connected to a single issuer status.









